Dolphin Anty's Starter is $10/mo for 20 profiles and $50 for 60, then Base is $89 for 100. AntiBrow makes local profiles unlimited and charges for concurrency instead. Verified pricing captured 2026-10-22, plus where Dolphin is the better fit.
Figures below come from dolphin-anty.com/pricing (it redirects to /tarifs/), captured 2026-10-22, monthly billing.
| Plan | Monthly | Profiles | Extra users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 | not available |
| Starter | $10/mo for 20, +$10 per 10 more, $50/mo for 60 | 20 to 60 | not available |
| Base | $89/mo | 100 | +$10 each |
| Team | $159/mo | 300 | +$20 each |
| Enterprise | from $299/mo | from 1,000, selectable up to 50,000 at a higher price | +$25 each |
Look at what the ladder is made of: every 10 profiles on Starter costs another $10. Going from 20 identities to 60 takes the bill from $10 to $50, and the step to Base is $39 more for 40 more profiles. The price tracks the number of identities you hold almost one for one.
That is the honest reason someone searches for an alternative. If you are at 55 profiles and climbing, you are paying $50/mo, and profile 61 moves you to $89/mo.
Local profiles are unlimited on every plan, free included. The paid tiers buy concurrency: how many browsers run at the same time (1 free, then 5, 20, 100), plus cloud sync and Live View. Proxies are not part of any plan. Paid entry is $9.9/mo.
Profile 61 costs the same as profile 6: nothing. If you run 200 identities but only ever have three windows open, you pay for three.
Two structural consequences:
Profiles are files you own. An AntiBrow profile is a directory on your disk. Cookies, localStorage, IndexedDB and passkeys are your files, cloud sync is opt-in per profile, and an unsynced profile is one we cannot read. Stop paying and the local profiles keep launching, because there is no phone-home check gating them.
Passkeys persist per identity. Each profile carries its own virtual authenticator, so a passkey enrolled on a site is captured and replayed at the next sign-in. Sites are moving passwordless login from optional to default, and an identity that cannot hold a passkey slowly loses the ability to log in at all.
Neither product controls your proxy quality, your behaviour, or the history of the accounts you bring, and those decide most detection outcomes. Both will get you flagged under bad conditions. Anyone promising otherwise is selling.
Same proxy, same target, both products, through whoer.net and CreepJS, then through whatever anti-bot wall your work actually has to clear. That last one is the only test that decides anything.
AntiBrow's free tier is unlimited local profiles with no card, so running that comparison against us costs nothing and can conclude we are worse.
Unlimited local profiles on the free tier, no card. Run the detectors before you trust any of this.