Comparison

A GoLogin alternative for people who cannot upload their cookies

GoLogin bills by profile count and keeps profiles in its cloud. AntiBrow gives unlimited profiles on your own disk and makes sync opt-in. Verified pricing, captured 2026-08-01, with the trade-offs stated in both directions.

Most comparison pages in this category are written by whoever is selling you something, so start with the part you can check. Everything below about GoLogin comes from their own pricing page, captured on 2026-08-01, and is linked so you can confirm it hasn't moved: gologin.com/pricing.

What GoLogin's pricing actually says

As of that capture, GoLogin's plans are priced by how many browser profiles you are allowed to have:

Plan Monthly Browser profiles Team members
Free $0 3 -
Professional $24/mo 100 1
Business $49/mo 300 1
Enterprise $99/mo 1,000 1
Custom $149/mo 2,000+ 1

The free tier is 3 profiles with, in their words, "all the benefits of Gologin, except for sharing profiles and team members."

That is a coherent business model. It is also the thing that decides whether GoLogin fits you, because the profile is the billing unit. Every identity you create is a line item.

Where AntiBrow is built differently

AntiBrow bills capacity, not identities. Local profiles are unlimited on every plan including the free one, and what you pay for is how many browsers run at the same time, plus optional cloud sync, managed residential proxies and Live View.

The practical difference shows up in two places.

Profiles live on your disk. An AntiBrow profile is a directory on your own machine: its cookies, localStorage, IndexedDB and passkeys are files you own. Cloud sync exists, but it is opt-in per profile, and a profile you have not synced is a profile we cannot read. If your team's policy is that live session cookies for client accounts do not go into a vendor's cloud, that is not a setting you have to trust us to honour, it is where the data was written in the first place.

Passkeys survive. Each profile carries its own virtual authenticator. When a site enrols a passkey, AntiBrow captures it and replays it on the next sign-in, so a passwordless account stays reachable from that identity across restarts. Platforms are moving passkeys from optional to default, and a profile that cannot hold one quietly stops being able to log in.

Where GoLogin is the better answer

Be honest about this, because a comparison page that finds no reason to pick the other product is an advertisement.

  • You want profiles in the cloud on purpose. Sharing an identity across a distributed team, from machines you do not control, is what a cloud-first product is for. AntiBrow's sync is designed to move your profile between your machines, not to be a team workspace.
  • You are already running at scale on it and it works. There is no importer for GoLogin's profile format yet. Moving means re-creating identities and re-logging in, and a warm account is worth more than a lower bill.
  • You need their specific integrations. We are not going to pretend to know your stack better than you do.

Where we would not claim an advantage

Both products spoof fingerprints and both will get you flagged if your proxy is bad, your behaviour is robotic, or the account you brought already has history. No browser controls those. Anyone telling you their product makes detection go away is selling, including us if we ever say it.

How to decide without trusting either of us

  1. Create a profile in each, with the same proxy.
  2. Open the public checks: whoer.net, and CreepJS at abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs.
  3. Then open whichever anti-bot wall you actually have to get past, because that is the only test that matters for your work.

AntiBrow's free tier is unlimited local profiles with no card, so that comparison costs you nothing but time. If it loses, you have learned something for free.

Download the desktop app or start from the SDK.

Check the claim yourself.

Unlimited local profiles on the free tier, no card. Run the detectors before you trust any of this.