Comparison

An Incogniton alternative without the free-tier expiry

Incogniton's free plan gives 10 profiles for two months, then drops to 3, and automation sits behind the second paid tier. AntiBrow's free tier is unlimited and does not expire. Verified pricing captured 2026-08-01.

Figures below come from incogniton.com/pricing, captured 2026-08-01.

What Incogniton's pricing actually says

Plan 6-month rate Standard Profiles Team seats
Free $0 - 10 for 2 months, then 3 -
Starter Plus $13.99/mo $19.99/mo 10 -
Entrepreneur $20.99/mo $29.99/mo 50 -
Professional $55.99/mo $79.99/mo 150 3
Custom $104.99+/mo $149.99/mo 500+ 10+

Two details deserve attention.

The free tier expires into a smaller one. Ten profiles for two months, then it automatically drops to three. That is a trial wearing a free plan's name, and it matters if you were planning to build a workflow on it.

Automation is gated at the second paid tier. Per their own feature list, the free plan excludes the REST API and Selenium, along with the Cookie Collector, Synchronizer, profile transfer and cookie export. API access appears at Entrepreneur, $20.99/mo on the 6-month rate.

Where AntiBrow is built differently

Unlimited local profiles free forever. No expiry, no card, no downgrade after two months. Paid plans start at $9.9/mo and buy concurrency (1 free, then 5, 20, 100 simultaneous browsers), cloud sync, managed residential proxies and Live View.

Automation is on the free tier. launch() returns standard Playwright Browser and Page objects, and the SDK runs as an MCP server from one line of config. There is no tier that unlocks scripting, because scripting is just Playwright and we did not build a proprietary API to gate.

Profile export is on the free tier too. Every profile exports to a portable archive carrying the fingerprint, cookies, storage and passkeys. We do not think the ability to leave should be a paid feature.

Passkeys persist per identity. Each profile carries its own virtual authenticator, so an enrolled passkey is captured and replayed at the next sign-in. As sites move passwordless login from optional to default, a profile that cannot hold one gradually loses access to accounts it created.

Where Incogniton is the better answer

  • Their built-in proxies fit your workflow. They advertise free built-in proxies from the Starter Plus tier, and if that covers your needs it is one less thing to manage.
  • You want the Cookie Collector and Synchronizer specifically. Those are real tools we do not have equivalents for.
  • You need seat-based team management. Their Professional tier includes 3 seats with roles. AntiBrow bills per account with no seat charge, which is cheaper but is not a permissions model.
  • You are already running on it. There is no Incogniton profile importer yet, so switching means re-creating identities and logging in again.

Where we would not claim an advantage

Neither product controls your proxy quality, your behaviour, or the history of the accounts you bring, and those decide most detection outcomes. Both will get you flagged under bad conditions.

Check it yourself

Same proxy, same target, both products, through whoer.net and CreepJS, then through the anti-bot wall your work actually has to clear.

Ours is free with unlimited local profiles and no card, and it stays that way in month three.

Download the desktop app or read the data boundary.

Check the claim yourself.

Unlimited local profiles on the free tier, no card. Run the detectors before you trust any of this.