An Octo Browser alternative with a free tier that is not a trial

Figures below come from octobrowser.net/pricing, captured 2026-10-22. Note the currency: Octo prices in EUR, not USD.

What Octo Browser's pricing actually says

Plan	Monthly	Annual (per mo)	Profiles included	Profiles with add-ons	Team members
Lite	10 EUR	7 EUR	3	-	-
Starter	29 EUR	21 EUR	10	up to 30, 49 EUR/mo	-
Base	79 EUR	56 EUR	100	up to 200, 149 EUR/mo	-
Team	169 EUR	119 EUR	350	up to 600, 244 EUR/mo	3, up to 6
Advanced	329 EUR	231 EUR	1,200	up to 100,000	8, then unlimited

The listed prices buy the included profiles. More profiles come from the calculator on the same page: on monthly billing, 10 EUR per 10 on Starter, 35 EUR per 50 on Base, 15 EUR per 50 on Team and 20 EUR per 100 on Advanced. Extra Team members are 25 EUR each.

There is no free desktop plan. The entry point is 10 EUR/mo for three profiles. API access starts at the Base tier, 79 EUR/mo.

That last detail matters if you automate. To script anything against Octo you are on their third tier, at 79 EUR/mo, before you have written a line.

Where AntiBrow is built differently

Unlimited local profiles free forever, no card, no expiry. Paid plans start at $9.9/mo and buy concurrency (1 free, then 5, 20, 100 simultaneous browsers), cloud sync and Live View. Proxies are not part of any plan.

Automation is on every tier, including free. launch() returns standard Playwright Page and BrowserContext objects, and the SDK runs as an MCP server from one line of config. There is no tier gate on the API, because the API is just Playwright.

Two other structural differences:

Profiles live on your disk. Cookies, storage and passkeys are your files. Cloud sync is opt-in per profile, so an unsynced profile is one we cannot read. That is where the data was written, not a promise you have to trust.

Passkeys persist per identity. Each profile has its own virtual authenticator, so an enrolled passkey is captured and replayed at the next sign-in. As sites make passwordless the default, a profile that cannot hold one gradually stops being able to log in.

Where Octo Browser is the better answer

• You want a mature, heavily polished desktop product. Octo has been at this a long time and it shows in the UI and the workflow tooling.
• You need real team seats. Their Team tier includes 3 members and goes up to 6. AntiBrow bills per account with no seat charge, which is cheaper but is not a permissions model.
• You are in a EUR-billing organisation. Small, but it is a real procurement consideration.
• Their mobile profiles matter to you. They advertise 100 free profiles for new users of their iOS and Android apps. We do not do mobile.
• You are already running on it. No Octo profile importer exists yet, so moving means re-creating identities and logging in again. A warm account beats a lower bill.

Where we would not claim an advantage

Neither product controls proxy quality, behaviour, or the history of the accounts you bring. Those decide most detection outcomes, and both products will get you flagged under bad conditions.

Check it yourself

Same proxy, same target, both products, through whoer.net and CreepJS, then through the anti-bot wall your actual work has to clear.

Ours is free to test with unlimited local profiles and no card, so that comparison costs you an afternoon and can conclude Octo is worth the 10 EUR.

Download the desktop app or see the automation surface.