Kameleo already gives unlimited local profiles and bills concurrent browsers, the same meter AntiBrow uses. The real differences are mobile emulation, a Firefox-based kernel, and how your script attaches. Pricing captured 2026-10-22.
Most "alternative" pages argue about price. With Kameleo that argument is thin, because Kameleo's pricing is built on the same meter as ours. What separates the two is mobile emulation, browser kernels, and the way your code gets hold of a browser. Kameleo figures below come from kameleo.io/pricing and their SDK readme at github.com/kameleo-io/kameleo, both captured 2026-10-22. Prices are in EUR.
| Plan | Monthly | Billed annually (per mo) | Concurrent browsers | Cloud profiles | Emulated mobile browsers | Team seats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 0 EUR | 0 EUR | 2 | 100 | 2 | 3 |
| Startup | 59 EUR | 45 EUR | 10 | 5000 | 10+ | unlimited |
| Business | 299 EUR | 225 EUR | 100 | 5000 | unlimited | unlimited |
| Enterprise | 1499 EUR | 1125 EUR | 1000 | 5000+ | unlimited | unlimited |
Every plan lists "Unlimited local profiles". The Free plan carries a 300-minute browser usage time limit; paid plans say unlimited usage time. API calls that fetch live fingerprint data are rate limited per plan, from 60 per minute on Free to 1200 on Enterprise. Headless mode is listed for Business and Enterprise.
AntiBrow also gives unlimited local profiles on every plan and charges for concurrency: 1 browser at a time on Free, then 5, 20 or 100. Paid plans start at $9.9/mo. So the honest summary is not "they count profiles and we do not". Neither does. The difference on price is where the steps sit: Kameleo's first paid tier is 10 concurrent browsers at 59 EUR a month, and its free tier is 2 concurrent browsers with a time budget. Look at how many windows you actually keep open at once, then read both ladders against that number.
This is the part that matters if you write code, and the two products are shaped differently.
Kameleo runs a local service. The readme's examples point the SDK at http://localhost:5050, search for a fingerprint, create a profile from it, start it, then connect your framework to an endpoint per profile:
ws://localhost:5050/puppeteer/{profileId} as browserWSEndpointws://localhost:5050/playwright/{profileId} through connectOverCDPhttp://localhost:5050/webdriver/{profileId} as the remote command executorThat design has a real advantage: any language that speaks WebDriver or CDP can drive it, and Kameleo ships clients for Python, JavaScript and C#.
AntiBrow is a Node library you import. There is no separate service to start and no endpoint to assemble:
import { AntiDetectBrowser } from 'anti-detect-browser'
const ab = new AntiDetectBrowser({ key: 'your-api-key' })
const { context, page } = await ab.launch({ profile: 'store-07' })
await page.goto('https://example.com')
page and context are real Playwright objects, so existing Playwright code runs on them as is. The same SDK also runs as an MCP server via npx anti-detect-browser --mcp, and the browser process stays alive between tool calls, which is what an agent holding a logged-in session needs. If your automation is a Selenium suite in C#, that is a point for Kameleo, not for us.
Both put the masking inside the browser engine; Kameleo's pricing page says so of its kernels, and AntiBrow applies the fingerprint below the JS layer. Neither controls your proxy quality, your behaviour, or the history of the account you bring, and those decide most detection outcomes. A vendor promising you will not be flagged is selling.
Take one script that already works and point it at both: Kameleo through its Playwright endpoint, AntiBrow through launch(). Use the same proxy, open whoer.net and CreepJS, then the site your work actually depends on. Budget Kameleo's free time limit for the test, and remember AntiBrow's free tier runs one browser at a time.
Unlimited local profiles on the free tier, no card. Run the detectors before you trust any of this.